Architectonics of metacognitive modeling of text messages in a foreign language

Authors

Nataliia Tokareva
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University,, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-3729
Maryna Tsehelska
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University,, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-6531
Olena Ilienko
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy,, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-9332
Nadiia Morhunova
Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University,, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-1103
Alla Krokhmal
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy,, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-489X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-8360-24-5.ch11

Keywords:

metacognitive modeling, communicative discourse, cognitive-discursive logic of text creation, fractal modeling of texts, text messages, projective-recursive technology, metacognitive schemes, foreign language learning

Synopsis

The work is devoted to the analysis of metacognitive resources of modeling text messages using projective-recursive technology in teaching English. The authors highlight the essential dimensions of communicative discourse and text as its basic element. The resources of cognitive-discursive and fractal modeling of texts in the plane of implementation of metacognitive activity of foreign language learning subjects are considered. The effectiveness of the integrative model ILDA in measuring the multimodal development of bilingual academic literacy of education seekers is proven. The role of recursive mechanisms in organizing thought-speech patterns and providing productive feedback in bilingual communication situations is substantiated. The experience of using metacognitive schemes of various types in teaching English for the formation of text creation skills is presented. The effectiveness of the use of metacognitive schemes in the logic of projective-recursive technology of teaching English is proven.

References

Tokareva, N. (2018). Genesis of the Logico-Semantic Organization of Adolescents Speech in the Post-Nonclassical Perspective of the Contemporaneity. Psycholinguistics, 24 (1), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-343-359

Tokareva, N., Tsehelska, M. (2020). Metacognitive Schemes as a Tool for Teaching English to Young Learners: Psychological Discourse. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12 (4), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/333

Tokareva, N., Tsehelska, M., Ilienko, O., Ikhsangaliyeva, G., Prylutska, L.; Morhunova, N., Levchenko, I., Kholodov, A. (Eds.) (2025). Projective-recursive technology as a predictor of efficiency in English language teaching. Implementation of modern technologies in language learning as a basis for the formation of communicative competences. Kharkiv: TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, 154–170. https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-8360-15-3.ch10

Tsehelska, M. V. (2016). Cognitive strategies to enhance English language teaching in Ukraine. Philological Studies: Scientific Bulletin of Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 14, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.31812/filstd.v14i0.235

Brinker, K., Pappert, St., Cölfen, H. (2024). Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Auflage. Grundlagen der Germanistik. Vol. 29. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 200.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman. 154. Available at: https://www.felsemiotica.com/descargas/Fairclough-Norman-Critical-Discourse-Analysis.-The-Critical-Study-of-Language.pdf

Halliday, M. А. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold, 256.

Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold, 142.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. 172. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/84133798/Theo_van_Leeuwen_Discourse_and_practice_New_tools_for_critical_discourse_analysis_New_York_Oxford_University_Press_2008_Pp_ix_172_Pb_29_95

Warnke, Ingo (Ed.) (2007). Diskurslinguistik nach Foucault. Theorie und Gegenstände (Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 187–210.

Heinemann, M., Heinemann,W. (2002). Grundlagen der Textlinguistik: Interaktion – Text – Diskurs. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 281.

Heinemann, W. (2011). Diskursanalyse in der Kontroverse. Tekst i dyskurs, 4, 31–67. Available at: https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/texts/tekst-i-dyskurs-text-und-diskurs/2011-tom-4/tekst_i_dyskurs_text_und_diskurs-r2011-t4-s31-67.pdf

Serazhym, K.; Rizun, V. (Ed.) (2002). Dyskurs yak sotsiolinhvalne yavyshche: metodolohiia, arkhitektonika, variatyvnist. Kyiv: Kyiv. Nats. un-t im.Tarasa Shevchenka, 392. Available at: https://moodle.znu.edu.ua/mod/resource/view.php?id=341609&forceview=1

Kijko, J. (2004). Grundlagen der Textlinguistik. Czernowitz: Ruta, 68.

Kiiko, Yu. Ye. (2015). Language system from the fractal point of view. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Filolohiia, 16, 117–120. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvmgu_filol_2015_16_34

Makaruk, L. L. (2021). Multimodal linguistics and its metalanguage. Philological science and education: transformation and development vectors. Latvia: Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”, 304–339. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-083-4-16

Makaruk, L. L. (2018). Multimodality and polycodeness in modern linguistic studies: schools, figures and approaches. Current Issues of Foreign Philology, 9, 133–142. Available at: https://journals.vnu.volyn.ua/index.php/philology/article/view/2602

Holubenko, N. (2022). Cognitive-discursive features of functioning of the lexical means of modality in intersemiotic translation. Humanities Science Current Issues, 51, 250–254. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/51-38

Tarricone, P. (2011). The Taxonomy of Metacognition. London: Psychology Press, 288. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830529

Coyle, D., Hood, Ph., Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://assets.cambridge.org/97805211/30219/excerpt/9780521130219_excerpt.pdf

Forceville, C.; Kristiansen, G. et al. (Eds.) (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197761.5.379

O’Halloran, K. L., Smith, В. А. (2011). Multimodal Studies: Exploring. Issues and Domains. London: Routledge 270. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/1962406/Multimodal_Studies

PSYCHOLOGICAL-PEDAGOGICAL AND LINGUODIDACTIC PROBLEMS OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SOCIETY DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
PSYCHOLOGICAL-PEDAGOGICAL AND LINGUODIDACTIC PROBLEMS OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SOCIETY DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Downloads

PDF

Pages

171-201

Published

March 31, 2026

Categories

Copyright (c) 2026 Nadiia Morhunova, Nataliia Tokareva, Maryna Tsehelska, Olena Ilienko, Alla Krokhmal

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Details about the available publication format: PDF

PDF

ISBN-13 (15)

978-617-8360-24-5

How to Cite

Tokareva, N., Tsehelska, M., Ilienko, O., Morhunova, N., & Krokhmal, A. (2026). Architectonics of metacognitive modeling of text messages in a foreign language. In N. Morhunova, I. Levchenko, & A. Kholodov (Eds.), PSYCHOLOGICAL-PEDAGOGICAL AND LINGUODIDACTIC PROBLEMS OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SOCIETY DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION (pp. 171–201). Kharkiv: TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC. https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-8360-24-5.ch11