Designing English and Ukrainian language courses with AI tools: comparative approach

Автори

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Україна
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-9456
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Україна
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-3619
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Україна
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-7128

Ключові слова:

Штучний інтелект (ШІ), Освіта 4.0, цифрова трансформація, викладання англійської мови (ELT), викладання української мови (ULT), розробка курсів, персоналізація, адаптивне навчання, зворотний зв'язок та оцінювання, рівність та етичне управління, ChatGPT, Copilot

Короткий опис

У цьому розділі розглядається, як інструменти штучного інтелекту (ШІ), насамперед ChatGPT та Copilot, можуть вплинути на розробку курсів викладання англійської мови (ELT) та викладання української мови (ULT) для студентів-філологів. Ґрунтуючись на структурованому порівняльному аналізі, дослідження синтезує літературу, аналізує чернетки курсів, розроблених за допомогою ШІ, та розглядає практичні випадки використання для оцінки впливу на архітектуру курсу, навчальні процеси та результати навчання. В рамках Освіта 4.0 та постійної цифрової трансформації результати показують, що ШІ підтримує персоналізацію, своєчасний формувальний зворотний зв'язок, мультимодальне проектування завдань та навчальні рішення на основі даних, одночасно підвищуючи ефективність часу та витрат для викладачів та адміністраторів. Водночас, постійні проблеми включають точність та надійність, чутливість до лінгвістичних та культурних нюансів, нерівномірну цифрову компетентність, технічні обмеження та етичні ризики, пов'язані з упередженістю, конфіденційністю та прозорістю. У розділі стверджується, що ШІ доповнює, а не замінює вчителя, і що ефективне впровадження вимагає нарощування потенціалу, управління для етичного та справедливого використання, а також уваги до готовності інституцій. Запропоновано прагматичні рекомендації щодо інтеграції штучного інтелекту в розробку курсів ELT/ULT для підвищення залученості та рівня володіння мовою, водночас захищаючи людиноорієнтовані цілі.

Посилання

Richards, J. C., Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 270. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532

Kvasova, O., Kavytska, T. (2014). The assessment competence of university foreign language teachers: A Ukrainian perspective. Language Learning in Higher Education, 4 (1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2014-0010

Bilianska, M., Kolodyazhna, A., Shuhailo, Y., Bohoslavets, L. (2021). Peculiarities of the Ukrainian Language as a Foreign Language Teaching in the Conditions of Distance Learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Languages, Literature and Social Communications (ICNTLLSC 2021). Atlantis Press, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210525.029

Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition. San Francisco: Pearson Education; San Francisco State University, 347.

Kharitonenko, L. (2022). Innovations and traditions in Ukrainian language teaching at the educational establishments of Ukraine: cases, models of the future. Futurity Education, 2 (1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.25.03.7

Chaika, O., Chahrak, N., Zhumbei, M., Apelt, H., Kopchak, L., Litvinova, A. (2021). Peda­gogical framework for poly multicultural education of foreign language students seeking a degree in teaching. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5 (3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2618

Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587464

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–33.

Chaika, O. (2023). Multicultural Education in Foreign Language Teaching: Task-Based Approach. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6 (3), 1476–1482. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i3-18

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. The State of ELT and a Way Forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications, 223. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/482737921/Lewis-Michael-the-lexical-approach

Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 826. Available at: https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Key-Issues-in-Language-Teaching-Reviewed-by-Le-Van-Canh.pdf

Bogush, A. M., Korolova, T. M., Popova, O. V. (2020). Foreign Language Education Standards: Ukrainian Dimension. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (4), 1261–1272. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080417

Shramko, R., Stepanenko, M., Pedchenko, S., Pryima, L., Komlyk, N. (2023). Teaching Ukrainian as foreign language (TUkFL) at pedagogical university: Innovations and perspectives. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13 (2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.33543/j.1302.222227

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A. (2014). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle ELT.

Chaika, O., Sharmanova, N. (2023). Innovative efficiency models in foreign language communication: lifelong learning and multiculturalism. Lifelong learning: models and methods of implementation. Kharkiv: PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, 59–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-7319-70-1.ch3

Dalimunthe, N. H., Widyantoro, A., Widiarti, Y., Islamiaty, D. (2023). Communicative games: Their implementation to improve students' speaking skills. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE), 2 (3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i3.617

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 352. Available at: https://www.ugr.es/~isanz/archivos_m3thodology/kumaravidelulibrocap1.pdf

Chaika, O., Domina, V., Nikolaienko, S., Fedosii, O. (2023). Zero tolerance to plagiarism in multicultural teamwork: Challenges for English-speaking non-EU and EU academics. World Journal of English Language, 13 (4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n4p14

Bevz, O., Gembaruk, A., Zabolotna, O. (2018). Teaching and learning English can be different: introducing new methodology curriculum. Inspiring Professional Excellence in Teaching Languages. Bălţi: S. n. Tipogr. "Indigou Color", 22–32. Available at: https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/22-32_8.pdf

Wang, R. (2019). Research on Artificial Intelligence Promoting English Learning Change. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Suzhou City, China: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/emehss-19.2019.79

Wang, Z., Cui, T., Cai, S., Ren, S. (2021). Team reflexivity, individual intellectual capital, and employee innovative behavior: a multilevel moderated mediation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23 (6), 1276–1295. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-11-2020-0362

Sun, Z., Anbarasan, M., Kumar, D. (2020). Design of an online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques. Computational Intelligence, 37 (3), 1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12351

Sharadgah, T., Sa'di, R. (2022). A systematic review of research on the use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching and learning (2015–2021): What are the current effects? Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 21, 337–377. https://doi.org/10.28945/4999

Mukhallafi, T. R. A. (2020). Using Artificial Intelligence for Developing English Language Teaching / Learning: An Analytical Study from University Students' Perspective. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10 (6), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p40

Fitria, T. (2021). The use of technology based on artificial intelligence in English teaching and learning). Elt Echo the Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6 (2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v6i2.9299

Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, A., Chartash, D. (2023). How does Chatgpt perform on the United States medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312

Zilberman, A. (2019). AI and Learning: The Latest Learning Methodology. eLearning Industry. Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/artificial-intelligence-best-tool-learning-english

Sallam, M. (2023). Chatgpt utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: a systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11 (6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887

Hu, X., Cai, Z., Olney, A. (2019). Semantic Representation and Analysis (SRA) and Its Application in Conversation-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems (CbITS). Learning Science: Theory, Research, and Practice. Publishing: McGraw-Hill Education, 103–126. Available at: https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.memphis.edu/dist/d/2954/files/2020/02/Hu2019-SRA.pdf

Maas, M. J., Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29 (2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210

Ravenscroft, A., Richards, P. Bunce, M.; Malloch, M., Evans. K., Cairns, L., O' Connor, B. (Eds.) (2022). Education 4.0: Is characterising and harmonising intelligences a way of thinking about a Pedagogy 4.0 for higher education, Final Chapter (40). The Sage Handbook of Learning and Work. Sage, 653–669. Available at: https://repository.uel.ac.uk/download/06908b53d78d1de277d941829e06f2b8e825ef85998ccffde5bb5e1224d1cf46/402483/AR-ch.40edited-late-draft-rv-V2.pdf

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. Globethics Publications, 621–653. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068

Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., van Der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: what to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38 (3), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.10074

Pratama, M. P., Sampelolo, R., Lura, H. (2023). Revolutionizing education: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence for personalized learning. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5 (2), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v5i2.877

Yin, Z. (2023). Applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Tutoring System for supporting students' English language learning in Hong Kong middle school. Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong. Available at: https://educoll.lib.eduhk.hk/records/applying-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-a-tutoring-system-for-supporting-QjObAPqh

Qian, R., Sengan, S., Juneja, S. (2022). English language teaching based on big data analytics in augmentative and alternative communication system. International Journal of Speech Technology, 25 (2), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-022-09960-1

Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460

Chaika, O. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in higher education. Youth and Market, 6-7 (214-215), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4634.2023.287898

Abrenilla, E. M., Redido, C., Abendan, C. F., Kilag, O. K. (2023). The Next Chapter of ELT: Embracing AI-Infused Pedagogies and Evolving Educational Strategies in the Post-Pandemic Landscape. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1 (5), 124–135. Available at: https://multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/view/106

Palamar, S., Brovko, K., Semerikov, S. O. (2023). Enhancing Foreign Language Learning in Ukraine: Immersive Technologies as Catalysts for Cognitive Interest and Achievement. Information Technology and Implementation (IT&I–2023, November 20–21). Kyiv, 69–81. Available at: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/48602/

Graesser, A., McNamara, D. (2010). Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language. Educational Psychologist, 45 (4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515933

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional technology and distance education, 2 (1), 3–10. Available at: https://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/Connectivism.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M. (Eds.) (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grubišić, A., Stankov, S., Žitko, B. (2015). Adaptive courseware: A literature review. Journal of universal computer science, 21 (9), 1168–1209. Available at: http://161.53.22.65/datoteka/783247.JUCS2015_grubisic_stankov_zitko.pdf

Ferguson, R., Buckingham Shum, S. (2012). Social Learning Analytics: Five Approaches. Proceedings of the 2nd international Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. New York: ACM Press, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330616

Plucker, J. A. (Ed.) (2022). Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and Practice. New York: Routledge, 370. Available at: https://www.homeworksmontana.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/20201207030946creativity_and_innovation_theory__research_and_practice.pdf.pdf

Johnson, W. L., Lester, J. C. (2016). Face-to-Face Interaction with Pedagogical Agents, Twenty Years Later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0065-9

Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 480. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2155693

Baranwal, D. (2022). A Systematic Review of Exploring the Potential of Teachable Agents in English Learning. Pedagogical Research, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11553

Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. Technology-Enhanced Learning. Springer, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1

Parrish, P., Wilson, B. (2008). A design and research framework for learning experience. Proc. AECT 2008. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/1141738/A_Design_and_Research_Framework_for_Learning_Experience

Svyrydiuk, V., Bodyk, O., Kalinina, L., Prokopchuk, N., Khrystych, N. (2024). The digital frontier: Strategies and tools for cultivating educational-strategic competence for pre-service teachers. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 101 (3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v101i3.5547

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

вересня 29, 2025

Ліцензія

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Деталі щодо доступних видів видань: PDF

PDF

ISBN-13 (15)

978-617-8360-20-7

Як цитувати

Chaika, O., Sharmanova, N., & Berezovska-Savchuk, N. (2025). Designing English and Ukrainian language courses with AI tools: comparative approach. в O. Chaika (ред.), EDUCATIONAL POLICY AND REFORMS: THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION. Kharkiv: ПП "ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИЙ ЦЕНТР". https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-8360-20-7.ch1