Conscious management of transformations: a concept of innovative management of educational institutions
Keywords:
Receptivity to the new, cognitive function, regulatory function, classification features, form of knowledge of reality, leading aspects of the perceived object, dominant feelings, field of activitySynopsis
Justifying the relevance of the topic, the authors emphasise that education aimed at fulfilling the strategic objectives of economic development is determined, on the one hand, by the achievements of the basic sciences, and, on the other hand, by the development of production. The objective need to apply innovations in the management of educational institutions is determined by the Strategy for Sustainable Development of Ukraine until 2030, the transition of the EU countries (and in the future, Ukraine) to Industry 5.0, and the prospect of rebuilding the state in the face of a shortage of personnel. The author's concept is based on the following philosophical and methodological justifications of the regularity of innovative management of educational institutions: the need to change the theory and practice of managing an educational institution in a changing, increasingly integrated world, intensified global problems and crises; the principle of advanced development and the principle of innovation as principles of organisation and development of educational systems; the essence of mastering the technologies of future creation, advanced, innovative management, as well as the The study used a multidisciplinary approach; integrated various scientific areas; the results of theoretical research and practical activities. The authors distinguish between the concepts of innovation management in educational institutions (management of innovations in the educational process) and innovation management (management innovations). Innovation management is based on the theoretical provisions of general (system) management, management of organisations, is subject to the laws of innovation activity, at the same time it has its own specifics in the content, organisational and implementation aspects, due to sectoral characteristics (management of educational institutions).
The concept of innovative management of educational institutions reveals the following: concept, subjects, objects, purpose, tasks, principles, process and tools of innovative management of educational institutions. The objects of innovative management of an educational institution are classified according to the following criteria: by type of resources (material, intangible, financial, technical, time-space, labour); by element of the management system (purpose, functions, methods, procedures, technologies, organisational structures); by management function (analysis, forecasting, design, planning, organisation, motivation, stimulation, control); by management tools (management decision, management technology, organisational structure). Along with local, modular and systemic changes, the authors distinguish permanent changes as a conscious management of transformations that become possible due to the search, development, implementation of innovative changes in management of an educational institution and monitoring of their effectiveness. On the basis of generalisation of the main stages of search and development of innovative changes; stages of the process of development and adoption of managerial decision on innovation; institutional cycle of management activity; project technology, an algorithm for permanent implementation of innovative changes in the management of an educational institution is developed. Innovative management as a type of activity is represented by a set of the following management tools: innovative management decisions, innovative management technologies, application of innovative structures and infrastructure, development of individual and group receptivity to the new; formation of an innovative environment of an educational institution.
References
Semenec, A. (2018). Lyudi so znaniyami "kak u vsekh" stanut lishnimi. Available at: https://www.rosbalt.ru/moscow/2018/01/26/1677559.html
Weizsaecker, E., Wijkman, A. (2018). Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. New York: Springer, 220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7419-1
Kolot, A. M. (2014). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid yak dominanta rozvytku ekonomichnoi nauky ta osvitnoi diialnosti. Sotsialna ekonomika, 1-2, 76–83. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/se_2014_1-2_15
Taleb, N. N. (2019). Antykrykhkist. Pro (ne)vrazlyve u realnomu zhytti. Kyiv: Nash format, 392.
Yevtodiuk A. V. (2002). Synerhetychni zasady modeliuvannia osvitnikh system. Kyiv, 198.
Prigozhin, І. (1986). Poriadok іz khaosu: novii dіalog liudini z prirodoiu. Moscow: Progres, 432.
Kremen, V. H. (Ed.) (2014). Synerhetyka i osvita. Kyiv: Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny, 348.
Khaken, G. (1980). Sinergetika. Moscow: Mir, 405.
Lohika. Multymediinyi pidruchnyk (2022). Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav. Available at: https://arm.naiau.kiev.ua/books/logika/lections/lections.html
Chepa, M.-L. A. (Ed.) (2010). Ukrainska psykholohichna terminolohiia: slovnyk-dovidnyk. Kyiv: DP "Informatsiino-analitychne ahentstvo", 302.
Klasyfikatsiia. Literaturoznavcha entsyklopediia. Vol. 1. Kyiv: VTs "Akademiia", 484.
Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. et al. (2001). Klasyfikatsiia. Yurydychna entsyklopediia. Vol. 3: K-M. Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia, 792.
Pekar, V. (2020). Kryza yak mozhlyvist. Available at: https://wz.lviv.ua/blogs/408472-kryza-iak-mozhlyvist
Subetto, A. I. (2007). Systemolohiia osvity ta osvitoznavstvo. Kostromskyi derzhavnyi universytet im. N. A. Nekrasova, 7, 22–36.
Puankare, A. (1990). O nauke: "Nauka i gipoteza". Moscow: Nauka, 736.
Zhurba, O. (2018). Interviu z Nataliieiu Tyshchenko. Yurydychna hazeta, 12-13. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/interview/energiya-znan-ta-dosvidu--ce-i-e-profesiynauspishnist.html
Matviienko, V. M., Kovtun, O. Yu. (2004). Prohrama rozvytku Orhanizatsii Obiednanykh Natsii. Ukrainska dyplomatychna entsyklopediia. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy, 812.
Samarska, L., Sas, N. M. (2021). Deep foundations of happiness. Principal fundamentals of different types of understanding happiness. Ukrainian Society, 76 (1), 23–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2021.01.023
Reitynh Global Innovation 1000. Available at: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/gx/en/insights/innovation1000.html
Chesbro, G. (2007). Otkrytye innovatcii. Moscow: Pokolenie, 336.
Altshuller, G. S. (1979). Tvorchestvo kak tochnaia nauka. Moscow: Sov. radio, 184.
Bandura, A.; Chubar, N. N. (Ed.) (2000). Teoriia sotcialnogo naucheniia. Saint Petersburg: EVRAZIIa, 320.
Vudzhek, T. (1997). Kak sozdat ideiu. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 288.
Kuzheva, S. N. (2011). Pozitivnoe otnoshenie k izmeneniiam – uslovie povysheniia vospriimchivosti k novovvedeniiam. Innovatcionnaia sistema Omskoi oblasti: sostoianie, problemy, perspektivy. Omsk: Tcentr marketingovykh kommunikatcii.
Leizier, U. (2007). Protcess razrabotki novoi uslugi. Marketing uslug. Available at: http://www.elitarium.ru/2007/10/04/process_razrabotki_novojj_uslugi.html/
Nikolko, V. N. (1990). Tvorchestvo kak innovatcionnyi protcess: (filosofsko-ontologicheskii analiz). Simferopol: Tavriia, 189.
Sas, N. M. (2003). Zastosuvannia aktyvnykh metodiv vykladannia i vyvchennia navchalnykh dystsyplin psykholoho-pedahohichnoho tsyklu. Aktualni problemy pidhotovky fakhivtsiv sotsialnoi roboty v Ukraini i za rubezhem. Uzhhorod: Mystetska liniia, 47–52.
Sas, N. (2014). Pidhotovka maibutnikh kerivnykiv navchalnykh zakladiv do innovatsiinoho upravlinnia: stan ta perspektyvy. Poltava: PNPU imeni V.H. Korolenka, 336.
Sas, N. (2013). Osnovy innovatsiinoho upravlinnia navchalnymy zakladamy. Poltava: SPDFO Harazha M. F., 178.
Sytnykov, A. P. (1996). Akmeolohycheskyi treninh: teoriia. metodyka, psykhotekhnika. Moscow: Tekhnolohycheskaia shkola obuchenyia, 428.
Shevyrev, A. V. (2008). Analiticheskaia zapiska "sistemno-kreativnoe myshlenie i upravlenie v deiatelnosti malogo i srednego biznesa". Kreativnaia ekonomika, 1 (13), 30–34.
Smirnov, Iu. Nevidimaia ruka rynka predskazanii! Idei iz budushchego.
Silvanovich, S. F. (2007). Kreativ dlia polzy dela: upravlenie tvorcheskim potentcialom kompanii. Minsk: Grevtcov Pablisher, 208.
Vudkok, M., Frensis, D. (1991). Raskreposhchennyi menedzher. Moscow: Delo, 320.
Sartan, G. N. Sovremennye tendentcii v korporativnom obuchenii personala. Available at: https://www.b-seminar.ru/article/show/782.htm
Niustrem, Dzh. V., Devis, K. (2000). Organizatcionnoe povedenie. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 448.
Rubinshtein, S. L. (2009). Osnovy obshchei psikhologii. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 713.
Sas, N. (2013). The Analysis of the Present Teaching Methods in the Sphere of Innovative Management for the Future Leaders Professional Training at Educational Institution. Naukovi pratsi Vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu "Donetskyi natsionalnyi tekhnichnyi universytet". Seriia: "Pedahohika, psykholohiia i sotsiolohiia", 1, 272–277.
Sas, N. M. (2011). Analiz pidkhodiv do praktyky roboty z kadramy u pedahohitsi ta menedzhmenti. Upravlinnia rozvytkom, 8, 203–206.
Sofii, N., Kuzmenko, V. (2006). Sto i odyn metod aktyvnoho navchannia. Osvita.ua. Available at: https://osvita.ua/school/method/1360/
Diachenko-Bohun, M. (2014). Aktyvni metody navchannia u vyshchomu navchalnomu zakladi. Vytoky pedahohichnoi maisternosti, 14, 74–79.
Vakhrusheva, T. Yu. (2008). Theoretical aspects of active methods of learning. Pedahohika, psykholohiia ta medyko-biolohichni problemy fizychnoho vykhovannia i sportu, 3, 46–49.
Vershinina, G. V. (2006). Aktivnye metody obucheniia – innovatcionnyi tip vospitaniia i obrazovaniia. Vestnik Kazakhstansko-Amerikanskogo svobodnogo universiteta, 4, 73–78.
Kosheleva, Iu., Arkhipov, M., Tokareva, M. (2012). Motivatciia personala. Upravlenie personalom, 16, 12–34.
Peretiatko, A., Tarianyk, O. (2008). Rozrobka efektyvnoi systemy upravlinnia personalom. Personal, 1, 42–45.
Eremin, A. L. (2005). Noogenez i teoriia intellekta. Krasnodar: "Sovetskaia Kuban", 356.
Sushko, M. (2019). Sozdanie svoei sistemy upravleniia ideiami. Available at: https://neaktor.com/blog/2019/05/24/sistemy-upravlenija
Khomutskii, D. (2005). Upravlenie ideiami: kak organizovat protcess. Upravlenie kompaniei, 8. Available at: https://www.management.com.ua/strategy/str122.html
Ozerov, K. G. (2010). Sistema kaidzen-predlozhenii na "Petro". Available at: https://up-pro.ru/library/production_management/kaizen/kaizen-na-petro/
Sadriev, A. R. (2013). Upravlenie znaniiami v innovatcionnoi deiatelnosti sovremennykh kompanii. Upravlenie intellektualnoi sobstvennostiu kak faktor povysheniia effektivnosti razvitiia organizatcii. Kazan: Kazan. un-t, 23–34.
Dolzhenko, R. A. (2014). Kontceptciia organizatcii innovatcionnoi deiatelnosti kompanii (na primere kommercheskogo banka). Finansy i kredit, 33 (609), 10–16.
Downloads
Pages
106-136
Published
December 30, 2024
Categories
Copyright (c) 2024 Nataliia Sas, Svitlana Lysenko, Anna Fastivets, Alla Kapiton, Iryna Babenko, Lidiia Cherednyk
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Details about the available publication format: PDF
PDF
ISBN-13 (15)
978-617-8360-06-1
How to Cite
Sas, N., Fastivets, A., Kapiton, A., Babenko, I., Cherednyk, L., & Lysenko, S. (2024). Conscious management of transformations: a concept of innovative management of educational institutions. In S. Tolochko (Ed.), TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION: MODERN CHALLENGES (pp. 106–136). Kharkiv: TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC. https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-8360-06-1.ch5
