Leveling breaks in the innovative development of socio-economic systems

Authors

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-9025
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-3114
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-6705
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-4860
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4333
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-7853

Keywords:

breaks in the innovative development, Global Innovation Index, high-tech products, socio-economic systems, EU-27 and Ukraine

Synopsis

The chapter accounts for the problem of identification and leveling breaks in the innovative development of socio-economic systems in example of Ukraine in the face of new challenges for the state in the process of developing relations with the EU.

The aim of the paper is to assess the level of innovation competitiveness of the Ukrainian economy and determine the most important factors for leveling breaks in its innovative development in the conditions of association with the EU.

The analysis of world rankings has shown that the innovative development of Ukraine determines comparative factor advantages in coverage of higher education, availability of scientific staff, and quality of research institutions, but low state support, lack of stability, and problems in institutional development hamper the country’s innovative potential. Cluster analysis showed that Ukraine is in the same cluster as Poland. Bulgaria and Romania, which have not yet fully consistent with the level of technological competitiveness of EU leaders. Among the strengths of Ukraine is the development of human resources and labor effect. The correlation analysis between the components of the Global Innovation Index and the factors of increasing Ukraine’s competitiveness indicates a moderate link between the development of clusters, the ratio of expenditures on R&D to GDP, and the export of ICT services. In order to level breaks in the innovative development of Ukraine it’s necessary: to increase both foreign investments and state financing; improvement of regulatory acts, reduction of corruption, institutional improvement; support of technologies through of regional cluster programs or “smart specialization”; integration into the European Research Area.

References

Şener, S., Sarıdoğan, E. (2011). The Effects Of Science-Technology-Innovation On Competitiveness And Economic Growth. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 815–828. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.127

Radivojević, V., Krstić, B., Stanišić, T. (2018). The role of technological readiness in the global competitiveness of serbian economy. Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization, 1, 111–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.22190/fueo1802111r

New ideas for the Investment Plan for Europe (2016). European Investment Bank.

The Global Competitiveness Report (2018). World Economic Forum.

Priede, J., Pereira, E. T. (2013). Innovation as a key factor in the international competitiveness of the european union. European Integration Studies, 7, 212–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.7.4228

Holroyd, C. (2007). Science and Technology Policies, National Competitiveness, and the Innovation Divide. Working Paper No 32. Waterloo: The Centre for International Governance Innovation

Fedulova, L. I. (2008). Tekhnolohichna modernizatsiia promyslovosti Ukrainy. Kyiv: Chetverta khvylia.

Momaya, K. (2001). International Competitiveness: Evaluation and Enhancement. New Delhi: Hindustan Publishing.

Fagerberg, J. (1988). International Competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 98 (391), 355–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2233372

Cassidy. M. (2007). Ireland's Competitiveness Performance, Quarterly Bulletin No. 2. Dublin: Central Bank of Ireland, 93–127.

Howells, J., Michie, J. (1998). Technological Competitiveness in an International Arena. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5 (3), 279–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571519884396

Enabling the next production revolution: issues paper (2015). Available at: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/IND(2015)2&docLanguage=En

UN Comtrade Database. Available at: https://comtrade.un.org/

European Innovation Scoreboard (2018). European Union.

Johnson, D. M., Porter, A. L., Roessner, D., Newman, N. C., Jin, X.-Y. (2010). Hightech indicators: assessing the competitiveness of selected European countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22 (3), 277–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537321003647313

Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Newman, N. C., Cauffiel, D. (2014). Indicators of high technology competitiveness of 28 countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 12 (1).

Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report. The Industrie 4.0 Working Group.

Ross, A. (2016). The Industries of the Future. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.

Matyushenko, I. Yu. (2016). Technological Competitiveness of Ukraine under Conditions of a New Industrial Revolution and Development of Convergent Technologies. The Problems of Economy, 1, 108–120. Available at: https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-ofeconomy-2016-1_0-pages-108_120.pdf

Matyushenko, I. Yu. (2017). Prospects of development of converging technologies in countries of the World and Ukraine for solving global problem. Kharkiv: Sole Proprietor L. M. Liburkina, 448.

Matyushenko, I. Yu., Khaustova, V. Ye., Kniaziev, S. I. (2017). Institutional Support of Innovative R&D in the Formation of Single Research Area in the EU and Ukraine. Science and Innovation, 13 (2), 5–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/scine13.02.005

Fagerberg, J. (1996). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12 (3), 39–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.3.39

América, J., Zamora-Torres, I. (2014). Сountries' competitiveness on innovation and technology. Global Journal of Business Research, 5, 73–83. Available at: https://www.theibfr.com/download/gjbr/2014-gjbr/gjbr-v8n5-2014/GJBR-V8N5-2014-7.pdf

Balcerzak, A. P. (2015). Europe 2020 Strategy and Structural Diversity Between Old and New Member States. Application of zero unitarization method for dynamic analysis in the years 2004–2013. Economics & Sociology, 8 (2), 190–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2015/8-2/14

Barca, F., McCann, P., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52 (1), 134–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., von Ehrlich, M. (2012). Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy. European Economic Review, 56 (4), 648–668. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.001

Prokopenko, O., Holmberg, V., Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Information and communication technologies support for the participation, of universities in innovation, R., networks (comparative study). Innovative Marketing, 14 (3), 17–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/im.14(3).2018.03

Hausmann, R., Klinger, B. (2006). Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage in the Product Space. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.939646

Hidalgo, C. A., Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (26), 10570–10575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106

Меlnik, Т. М. (2008). Eksportnyy potentsial Ukrayiny: metodolohiya otsinky ta analiz. International economic policy, 241–271. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mep_2008_1-2_11

Kireev, A. P. (2001). Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika. Ch. II. Mezhdunarodnaia makroekonomika: otkrytaia ekonomika i makroekonomicheskoe programmirovanie. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniia, 488.

Bogomazova, V. M. (2003). Metody prohnozuvannya pokaznykiv zovnishn oekonomichnoyi diyal nosti. Kyiv, 2003.

Sushchenko, O., Trunina, I. (2016). Creation of innovation clusters as a line of enterprise competitiveness improvement in the field of foreign economic activity. Actual Problems of Economics, 177 (3), 191–198.

Koval, V., Duginets, G., Plekhanova, O., Antonov, A., Petrova, M. (2019). On the supranational and national level of global value chain management. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6 (4), 1922–1937. doi: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(27)

Matyushenko, I. Yu., Redko, N. (2019). The assessment of Ukraine's readiness for innovations in the conditions of the spread of technologies of the new industrial revolution. Acta Innovations, 33, 5–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.33.1

Enabling the next production revolution: issues paper (2015). Available at: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/IND(2015)2&docLanguage=En

The future of manufacturing: Driving capabilities, enabling investments (2014). Global Agenda Council on the Future of Manufacturing. UNIDO.

The Global Innovation Index (2017). INSEAD. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf

European Innovation Scoreboard. (2019). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/36282/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native

DATABASE (2019). Eurostat. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Global Innovation Index Report (2020). Available at: https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/assets/dept/globalindices/docs/GII-2020-report.pdf

Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2019. World Economic Forum.

Global Innovation Index 2011 – 2019. INSEAD. Global Innovation Index.

IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2017–2019. Global Assets.

Hordunovskyi, O. M. (2014). Suchasnyi stan ta napriamy posylennia innovatsiinoi bezpeky Ukrainy. Financial space, 2 (14), 23–29.

Alekseev, I. V., Urba, S. I. (2016). The innovative strategy as a means to enhance the security and competitiveness of the Ukraine's economy. Efficient economy, 9. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?ежop=1&z=5138

Matyushenko, I., Reznikov, V., Tofaniuk, O., Gavrilova, A. (2021). Economic security of the EU and Ukraine in terms of their association. Innovation Management and Information Technology Impact on Global Economy in the Era of Pandemic. Proceedings of the 37th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA). Cordoba, 5346–5357.

Vatskovsky, K. S., Gordienko, L. Yu. (2012). Bank of methods and models to support transformational management decisions in socio-economic systems. Problems of the economy, 2, 38–42.

Yurynets, Z.V. (2013). Upravlinnia usunenniam pereshkod innovatsiiamna pidpryiemstv. Bulletin of social and economic researches, 2 (49), 127–131.

Kutsenko, T. M. (2012). The theoretical bases of innovation development strategy in the movement of innovative processes intensification. Marketing and innovation management, 4, 308–317.

Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku sfery innovatsiinoi diialnosti na period do 2030 roku (2019). Rozporiadzhennia Kabinety Ministriv Ukrainy No. 526-r. 10.07.2019. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/526-2019-%D1%80#Text

Downloads

Pages

71-102

Published

December 31, 2022

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Details about the available publication format: PDF

PDF

ISBN-13 (15)

978-617-7319-64-0

How to Cite

Matyushenko, I., Ryeznikov, V., Tofaniuk, O., Khanova, O., Grygorova-Berenda, L., & Zaitseva, A. (2022). Leveling breaks in the innovative development of socio-economic systems. In INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL ECONOMIES (pp. 71–102). Kharkiv: TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC. https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-7319-64-0.ch3