Management of a viable enterprise on the basis of the approach to management of a «living» organization and the concept of viable systems
Keywords:
Viable system, «living» organization, functional subsystem, management system, model, operating element, metasystem, biological system, economic systemSynopsis
The innovative vector of development is a modern approach to production, sales of services, etc., their adaptation to current societal requirements. It is provided by the transformation of scientific research and development, other scientific and technological achievements into a new or improved product, introduced to the market, into an updated or improved technological process, used in practice. Consequently, approaches to enterprise management are also transformed into modern realities and acquire shades of innovative approaches. Effective management is necessary to ensure the viability of enterprises, and new tools, methods and approaches to management are especially important here. The aim of the article is to develop theoretical provisions for the formation of a viability management system based on the concept of viable systems and the approach to managing an organization as a «living» system. The work identifies that effective viability management requires the creation of an organizational structure in an enterprise that will function as a «living organism». The representation of the enterprise system in the form of a living organism is considered. To form a holistic system of an enterprise, the systems of the human body are considered in more detail and the corresponding systems of the enterprise are determined. A set of functional subsystems of an enterprise by analogy with the systems of a living organism, the activity of which is interdependent, which ensures the stability of the «living organism» of the enterprise to the influence of external conditions has been formed. It has been determined, that in order to fully maintain the viability of an enterprise, it is necessary to study not only the «physical body» of the enterprise as a set of functional subsystems, but also its «soul» – corporate culture, which must be developed on the basis of paradigms of sustainable development and social responsibility.
References
Talalaev, A. (2011). Upravlenie organizatsiei s pozitsii zhivykh sistem. Ekonomika i zhizn, 45 (9411). Available at: https://www.eg-online.ru/article/151715/ Last accessed: 01.12.2019
De Gius, A. (2004). Zhivaia kompaniia. Rost, nauchenie i dolgozhitelstvo v delovoi srede. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Stokgolmskaia shkola ekonomiki v Sankt-Peterburge, 218.
De Gius, A. (2006). Samoobuchaiuschaiasia organizatsiia. Moscow: Dobraia kniga, 224.
Bir, S. (2009). Mozg firmy. Moscow: Librokom, 416.
Nait, F. (2009). Etika konkurentsii. Moscow: EKOM, 605.
Perotto, P. (1990). Darvinizm i menedzhment. Novii khoziain i strategiia obnovleniia. Libri: Sole 24 Ore, 203.
Drozdov, I. N. (2002). Upravlenie razvitiem organizatsii. Dalnevostochnii gosudarstvennii tekhnicheskii universitet. Vladivostok: Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologii.Available at: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/4498 Last accessed: 23.04.2021
Chirico, J. M., Nystrom, A. M. (2018). The Living Company: A Systems Approach. Evolving Leadership for Collective Wellbeing (Building Leadership Bridges). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 221–235. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/s2058-880120180000007014
De Geus, A. P.(1997). The Living Company. Harvard Business Review, 75 (2), 51–59. 10. De Geus, A. P. (1998). The living company: A recipe for success in the new economy. The Washington Quarterly, 21 (1), 197–205. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/01636609809550303
Harder, J. W., Robertson, P. J. (2006). The spirit of the new workplace: Leading in a living organization. The Human Factor, 18–23.
Tracy, L. (1989). The living organisation: Systems of behavior. New York: Praeger.
Meier, K., Devis, S. (2007). Zhivaia organizatsiia. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Dobraia kniga», 386.
Arghode, V., Jandu, N., McLean, G. N. (2020). Exploring the connection between organizations and organisms in dealing with change. European Journal of Training and Development, 45 (4/5), 366–380. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-06-2020-0095
Vlados, C. (2013). Change Management and Innovation in the «Living Organization»: The Stra. Tech. Man Approach. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7 (2), 229–256. doi: http://doi.org/10.25019/mdke/7.2.06
Bir, S. (1993). Mozg firmy. Moscow: Radio i sviaz, 416.
Beer, S. (1994). Brain of the Firm. Chichester: John Wiley Sons, 346.
Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of Enterprise. London and NewYork: John Wiley, 582.
Vrat, P., Agarwal, A. (2013). Designing a performance management system inspired by human body organization. International Journal of Bioassays, 2 (6), 889–896. Available at: https://www.ijbio.com/articles/designing-a-performance-management-system-inspiredby-human-body-organization.pdf Last accessed: 21.06.2021
Poliakov, A. (20140). Struktury predpriiatiia. Grafy zatrat. Available at: http://graphcost.com/index.php/menu-afuoop/2014-04-07-14-53-14/5-structuri-predpriatia Last accessed: 28.06.2021
Tereschenko, V. M. Zhivoi organizm kompanii. Elitarium. Available at: http://www.elitarium.ru/zhivojj_organizm_kompanii/ Last accessed: 23.04.2021
Serbulov, Iu. S., Stepanov, L. V., Glukhov, D. A. (2013). Modelirovanie rynochnykh barerov na osnove iskusstvennoi immunnoi sistemy. Lesotekhnicheskii zhurnal, 4, 223–231.
Beklemishev, A. V., Bobrova, A. V. (2007). Upravlenie predpriiatiem: Ot finansovogo monitoringa k sovetu direktorov. Moscow: Finans. gazeta, 47.
Boidell, T. (1996). Kak uluchshit upravlenie organizatsiei. Moscow: Assiana, 204.
Khammer, M., Champi, Dzh. (1997). Reinzhiniring korporatsii: Manifest revoliutsii v biznese. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo un-ta, 332.
Fedotova, I. V. (2013). Formuvannia modeli zhyttiezdatnoi systemy upravlinnia ATP. Ekonomika transportnoho kompleksu. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kharkiv: KhNADU, 22, 109–120.
Awuzie, B., McDermott, P. (2016). A systems approach to assessing organisational viability in project based organisations. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6 (3), 268–283. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-08-2014-0037
Hoverstadt, P., Bowling, D. (2002). Modelling Organisations using The Viable System Model. Fractal, 14. Available at: https://www.fractal-consulting.com/wp-content/uploads/Modelling-Organisations-using-the-Viable-System-Model.pdf Last accessed: 9.05.2021
Pérez Ríos, J. (2010). Models of organizational cybernetics for diagnosis and design. Kybernetes, 39 (9/10), 1529–1550. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/03684921011081150
Vahidi, A., Aliahmadi, A. (2018). Describing the Necessity of Multi-Methodological Approach for Viable System Model: Case Study of Viable System Model and System Dynamics Multi-Methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32 (1), 13–37. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9452-0
Vahidi, A., Aliahmadi, A., Teimoury, E. (2019). Researches status and trends of management cybernetics and viable system model. Kybernetes, 48 (5), 1011–1044. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2017-0433
Brazhnikova, L. N. (2011). Zhiznesposobnost sistemy strategicheskogo upravleniia finansovoi deiatelnostiu predpriiatii ZhKKh. Pratsі Odeskogo polіtekhnіchnogo unіversitetu, 3 (37), 34–40.
Lysenko, Iu. G. (Ed.) (2008). Metodologiia modelirovaniia zhiznesposobnykh sistem v ekonomike. Donetsk: OOO «IUgo-Vostok, Ltd», 361.
Milov, A. V., Timokhin, V. N., Chernous, G. A. (2004). Ekonomicheskaia kibernetika. Donetsk: DonNU, 418.
Sokolova, L. V. (2004). Teoriia i praktyka adaptatsii pidpryiemstv do minlyvoho biznes-seredovyshcha. Kharkiv: KhNURE, 288.
Shpak, S. A. (2018). Category of adaptation and adaptivity in the enterprises’ restructuring management theory. The Journal of Zhytomyr State Technological University. Series: Economics, 1 (83), 96–103. doi: http://doi.org/10.26642/jen-2018-1(83)-96-103
Prives, M. G., Lysenkov, N. K., Bushkovich, V. I. (2001). Anatomiia cheloveka. Saint Petersburg: Gippokrat, 704.
Dubynin, V. A., Sapin, M. R., Sivoglazov, V. I., Kamenskii, A. A. (2010). Reguliatornye sistemy organizma cheloveka. Moscow: Drofa, 386.
Sapin, M. R., Bilich, G. L. (2002). Anatomiia cheloveka. Moscow: Oniks, 465.
Sinelnikov, R. D., Sinelnikov, Ia. R. (1996). Atlas anatomii cheloveka. Vol. 1–4. Moscow: Meditsina, 488, 272, 216, 316.
Buleev, Y. P., Briukhovetskaia, N. E. (2009). Predpryiatyia y novie orhanyzatsyonnie strukturi v systeme sotsyalno-ekonomycheskykh otnoshenyi obshchestva. Ekonomika promyslovosti, 2, 3–14.
Taran, V. A. (2018). Modern holistic understanding of the world. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniia, 2 (69), 218–220. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennoe-holisticheskoe-ponimanie-mira Last accessed: 05.10.2020
Kleiner, G. B. (2018). Humanistic Management, Social Management and System Management – The Way to the Management of the 21st Century. Russian Management Journal, 16 (2), 231–252. doi: http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2018.204
Kleiner, G. B. (2000). Institutsionalnye faktory dolgovremennogo ekonomicheskogo rosta. Ekonomicheskaia nauka sovremennoi Rossii, 1, 5–20.
Kleiner, G. B. (2011). Resursnaia teoriia sistemnoi organizatsii ekonomiki. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta, 9 (3), 3–28.
Puche, J., Ponte, B., Costas, J., Pino, R., de la Fuente, D. (2016). Systemic approach to supply chain management through the viable system model and the theory of constraints. Production Planning & Control, 27 (5), 421–430. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1132349
Hoverstadt, P., Bowling, D. (2005). Organisational viability as a factor in sustainable development of technology. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 4 (2), 131–146. doi: http://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.4.2.131/1
Hoverstadt, P.; Reynolds, M., Holwell (Retired), S. (Eds.) (2020). The Viable System Model. Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide. London: Springer, 89–138. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_3
